Saturday, December 5, 1998
Discord over sexuality, gender roles runs like
a fault line through America's religious denominations
By Mark I. Pinsky
The Orlando Sentinel
Is American religion facing a Sexual Reformation -- one as
divisive as the Protestant Reformation that split Christianity
in the 16th century?
Discord over sexuality and gender roles runs like a fault line
through America's religious denominations.
This controversy also highlights the differences between mainline
denominations, which are losing membership, and evangelical and
conservative churches, which have grown dramatically in recent
decades.
Moreover, the split threatens to fracture the religious institutions
themselves, especially mainline ones.
This is not surprising, said Central Florida Episcopal Bishop
John Howe, because these issues "run not only through the
religious denominations but through the whole of American society."
In fact this split within and among the various religious denominations
is similar to the ones that characterize the country on political
matters that have little or nothing to do with sex or traditional
religious issues.
Homosexuality is condemned categorically by evangelical and
fundamentalist Christians, who cite passages in the books of Leviticus
and Romans. But in mainline denominations, positions are not so
clearly drawn. The role of women in church leadership is equally
contentious.
Although no one can say for certain whether these differences
will split denominations, recent events suggest they might. Experts
caution that walkouts depend on each denomination's theological
center of gravity.
"The question is, who walks?" said Mark Silk, director
of the Center for the Study of Religion in Public Life at Trinity
College in Hartford, Conn. "People have always 'walked' in
American religion."
Votes and actions by mainline denominations have run against
blessing same-sex unions and ordaining gay clergy, but divided
on the issue of women's roles.
"This will be an ongoing struggle in religion because
this is an ongoing struggle in American life," said Silk,
who believes that the central battle is over sexuality. "The
gay issue is the real third rail out there. That's what's sending
the sparks flying."
Despite the intensity of the debate, most of the splits have
so far taken place along the edges of the denominations.
"Splits are possible, but my sense is there is a recovery
of commitment to more traditional positions," said the Rev.
Geoffrey Wainwright, chairman of the World Methodist Council's
standing committee on ecumenism. "I think those positions
will hold, but there will be significant tensions."
At an August meeting in England of the World Anglican Communion
-- which includes the Episcopal Church -- bishops voted overwhelmingly
to oppose the ordination of gay clergy; to oppose the blessing
of same-sex unions; and to allow bishops to refuse to ordain women
priests.
For the 2.4-million member Episcopal Church in the United States,
a binding vote allowing the blessing of same-sex unions was defeated
by a single vote at the denomination's national meeting in 1997
in Philadelphia.
Many traditional Episcopalians expect that when the issue is
raised again the vote may go the other way., That is why several
of these congregations have left the denomination, either to establish
independent, conservative Anglican churches or to join the Eastern
Orthodox Church.
Bishop Howe of the Episcopal Diocese of Central Florida supports
traditionalism. As a result, the diocese has withheld money from
the national denomination, and he has joined the American Anglican
Council, a dissident organization that has not left the national
denomination.
Other mainline denominations grappled with the issues of sexuality
and gender roles this summer.
The Roman Catholic Church, which condemns homosexual practice,
has in recent years actively reached out to gay and lesbian worshipers,
establishing special ministries for them. This move has not been
without controversy.
In early August, the Rev. John Harvey called on Catholics to
join him "in a battle with the gay movement." Speaking
to a Massachusetts gathering of a group called "Courage,"
the New York priest said the fight against homosexuality is part
of "a cultural war between Christianity and radical liberalism."
Later that same month, the Judicial Council of the 8.5-million
member United Methodist Church ruled that ministers who conduct
same-sex marriages violate church law. A pastor who did so in
Nebraska was acquitted last March by a church jury that said the
denomination's policy was unclear. However, the Rev. Jimmy Creech
was not reappointed to his post at the First United Methodist
Church of Omaha.
The action by the Judicial Council, which serves as a "supreme
court" for United Methodists, may have come too late to retain
some restive congregations. The Kingsburg United Methodist Church
in California, unhappy with recent trends, already has left the
denomination. The California United Methodist Conference has attempted
to freeze the congregation's assets.
Church consultant Lyle Schaller said following the judicial
council's action that a schism in the denomination was a possible
outcome of the "increasing degree of polarization" among
Methodists.
"Sadly, I fear that this debate over sexuality and marriage
will not go away," said Mark Tooley, director of the conservative
United Methodist organization UMAction.
"As long as there's a permanent divide between the rank
and file church members and the national permanent bureaucracy,
you're going to have an insoluble controversy," he said.
Emphasizing that point, Creech released a letter from 363 Methodist
ministers on Oct. 11, urging the denomination to end its ban on
celebrating gay and lesbian marriages. The next day, Chicago Bishop
Joseph Sprague filed a formal complaint against the Rev. Gregory
R. Dell, pastor of Broadway United Methodist Church, for failing
to uphold the council's ruling by performing a service uniting
two men.
In June, the 15.7-million member Southern Baptist Convention
-- which permits but does not favor women pastors -- generated
controversy over a resolution saying wives should "graciously
submit" to their husbands.
"The debate within Baptist life is about human sexuality
more than homosexuality," said the Rev. Robert Parham, executive
director of the Baptist Center for Ethics in Nashville. "A
bigger issue than the ordination of women is the affirmation of
professional women. Will professional women be recognized and
given authentic leadership in Baptist churches?"
Provoked by the Southern Baptist Convention action, First Baptist
Church in Raleigh, N.C., one of that city's oldest and most prestigious
Baptist congregations, announced this fall that it was compelled
to leave the SBC. The congregation has had women deacons since
1874.
"I'm very sad we were in a position that we had to make
a decision," the church's senior pastor, Rev. Daniel Day,
told the Associated Press. "The mood of regret and sadness
was heavy within the room."
Baptist churches in Asheville, N.C., and Austin, Texas, also
announced their intention to leave.
"One of the real dangers of the vote is that it is scaring
away bright, professional Christians from Baptist churches,"
said Parham. "They are too embarrassed to admit being Baptist
in their workplace."
Denomination leaders said the departure of the Raleigh church
would be no great lossand wished them well. In fact. two other
North Carolina congregations were expelled from the Southern Baptist
Convention in 1992 for acting "to approve or endorse homosexual
behavior," the first such action in the denomination's history.
Leaders of some denominations, like Reform Judaism, find the
debate over sexuality so divisive that they simply stop talking
about it. Before their recent national convention, a decision
was made to keep the issue off the agenda.
Earlier this year the 2.6-million-member Presbyterian Church,
U.S.A., voted 2-1 to require clergy to remain chaste outside of
a traditional marriage between a man and a woman. At its annual
General Assembly in Charlotte, N.C., in June, church members rejected
by a 412-94 margin an effort to reopen debate on the sexuality
issue.
"The issue is not going to go away," said the Rev.
Homer Spencer, a retired Presbyterian minister and missionary
in Lakeland, Fla., who supports gay ordination.
There are those on both sides of the divide who say the debates
are only superficially about sexuality and gender roles. What
is really at stake, they say, is the way believers approach historic
Christian tradition.
"The bigger issue that the fault line is about is the
question of how one interprets and uses the Bible," said
the Rev. Michael Hopkins of St. George's Episcopal Church of Glen
Dale, Md., a national leader of Integrity, a organization that
supports gay Episcopalians. "That to me is the bigger question
that the whole sexuality issue brings to the fore."
On that point, at least, even Orlando's Bishop Howe agrees.
"I believe that the efforts by the 'gay activists' within
the (Episcopal) Church are expressive of a much larger re-interpretation
of the Christian faith itself," Howe said.
Another question is what drives the current debate over sexuality.
Religious traditionalists maintain that they are acting as
a bulwark against aggressive, homosexual activists who are pushing
an "agenda."
This agenda, they charge, seeks to make gay rights the next
item on the broader civil rights agendas that has to date carved
out legal protections for racial minorities and the disabled.
In the Sunbelt, where evangelicals set the tone for most moral
and political debates, there has been convergence of interests
between religious conservatives and the Republican Party.
With the emergence of "Christian scorecards," distributed
in church parking lots before elections, this convergence has
turned into a tactical alliance.
Those in mainline religious dominations charge that social
conservatives are raising money and building political support
by demonizing homosexuality as a sinister, "lavender menace,"
in much the same way as American liberals, radicals and communists
were once portrayed as a "red menace" a half-century
ago.
Republican congressional leaders such as Senate Majority Leader
Trent Lott, R-Miss., and House Majority Leader Dick Armey, R-Texas,
have denounced homosexuality in recent months, and the GOP-controlled
Congress has been hostile to legislating gay rights.
For their part, many members of mainline denominations with
more liberal positions on sexuality have been allied with the
Democratic Party.
In years past, these same churches have opposed the Reagan
administration's policies in the 1980s Central America and, before
that, joined Democratic opposition to the Vietnam War and backed
civil rights legislation.
But, as Americans can tell from the attention given President
Clinton's activities with Monica Lewinsky, sex sells.
"Armies need recruits," said University of Chicago
church historian Martin Marty. "The stalemated abortion wars
stimulate few new partisans. But entrepreneurs can exploit homosexuality."
X X X
(c) 1998, The Orlando Sentinel (Fla.).
Visit the Sentinel on the World Wide Web at http://www.orlandosentinel.com/.
On America Online, use keyword: OSO.
Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Information Services.
Send a Letter to the Editor about This
Story | Start or Join A Discussion about This Story
Send the URL (Address)
of This Story to A Friend:
Copyright ©1998,
Abilene Reporter-News / Texnews / E.W. Scripps Publications
|