Saturday, December 5, 1998
A lesbian goes undercover with the religious
right and finds several surprises
By Murray Dubin
Knight Ridder Newspapers
NEW YORK -- The writer wore a disguise: a wig, flowered hat,
long flowered dress and pearls. The pearls were probably a little
much. "I may have overdone it. I had not been dressing too
femininely back then."
Radical feminist-lesbian, butch-looking Donna Minkowitz was
going undercover in 1993 to report on a two-day meeting of the
Christian Coalition for the Village Voice.
And she found something she wasn't looking for.
"What disturbed me the most about them was present in
me. It was the misogyny, the fear and hatred of women. Me, a feminist
and a lesbian. I hated the clothes. They were feminine and dowdy
and it was a humiliation wearing them."
She was a lesbian separatist, believing that "we're strong
and powerful," and looking down on straight women, pointing
to "those submissive women over there, the ones being victimized."
"But wearing those clothes made me look at a part of myself
that wants to be submissive and powerless sometimes. It eventually
made me realize that being feminine was not a terrible thing."
Her first book, "Ferocious Romance: What My Encounters
with the Right Taught Me About Sex, God and Fury," tells
the story of this coming out of Minkowitz, a lesbian and a feminist
to the core, but not nearly as radical as before.
Chronicling repeated forays into the religious right, the book
also pulls at the orthodoxies of two very different worlds, one
politically gay-lesbian and the other, the religiously and politically
tilted right. And she finds, to her surprise, similar sinews.
Published just weeks ago, it is a book that will likely antagonize
both sides.
She is 34, a Brooklyn Jew lacking the borough's accent or affect.
A Yale graduate, she does not appear to have been someone messianic
about her political beliefs, but she was. Small, with a blend-in-the-crowd
face, sweet voice and gentle mien, she does not appear to have
been convinced of the holiness of sadomasochism, but she was.
On the page, however, small, sweet and gentle go bye-bye, replaced
by audacious, passionate, revealing and just plain funny.
Her writings about the religious right began in 1991 because
she was scared of their anti-gay stance. She wanted to know more
about the enemy, but instead of crawling under enemy lines, face
covered in black, she walked in the front door, adorned with earrings,
flowered dress and sensible shoes.
"The Tailhook scandal had just begun. At the Christian
Coalition meeting, the women delegates were calling the harassed
women from Tailhook sluts. That shocked me, but it also kicked
something off in me. I enjoyed it when they said terrible things.
I think liberals get a vicarious pleasure ... because we can't
say 'God hates fags' or 'Throw the immigrants out.' But we can
get some pleasure without taking any responsibility for it.
"I was applauding Ollie North, despite thinking that he's
a fascist. I was waving a flag for him and it was very heady.
Part of being gay for me was believing that you're better than
anyone else. That's ... how people feel at the Christian Coalition."
The Toronto Airport Christian Fellowship has been "kicked
out of its own denomination for being too extreme," she writes.
Worshipers lying on their backs there are told to "just marinate
in the Lord ... Just soak."
Minkowitz: "I knew I'd feel very much at home here, with
people who cackle, ululate, and bray their praise of God ... I
like people this warm, ecstatic, extreme and cheerily fey. ...
My own people, gays and lesbians, have been known to get pretty
ecstatic themselves; but I've discovered that our alleged enemies,
the religious right, like to go out of control and get crazy as
much as we do. They just do it in their own way."
She got inside a Promise Keepers conclave by binding her breasts
and adding a mustache. She found the message anti-abortion, anti-gay
and "suspicious of sex generally."
But she also found it "startlingly feminist. And in some
ways, it was a message that really spoke to me because there's
part of me that's a lot like a man. Many lesbians -- and lots
of straight women, for that matter -- have grown up terrified
of not being tough enough, fearful of weakness and effeminacy."
And she wonders at the moral paradox: "If there is good
in 'them,' who believe homosexuality is wrong and give money to
the clinic blockaders, then there is liable to be good in the
most monstrously evil persons I will ever meet, and mercy will
always be required of me."
Moral paradox wasn't on her mind when she read an ad in Charisma
Magazine for Total Women Ministries urging a beauty makeover,
a way for women to bring themselves closer to God. Minkowitz couldn't
resist.
But again, she had to disguise herself. "For me, looking
like a woman is harder than clapping for Pat Buchanan," she
writes.
The women leaders were Gina and Laura. "The hairbrushes,
scarves and other baubles underscore (their) sense of the Holy
Spirit as a spirit of love and frivolity, nurturing and self-nurturing,
a feminine lightheartedness I have always envied. ...
"Frivolity has always been hard for me," she says.
"Butch people are just not that frivolous."
Later there is hugging, holding and a "promiscuous friendliness"
that Minkowitz likens to a ladies' night at a Manhattan gay bar.
Clothing and accessory tips ("vests are wonderful, especially
for small-busted women") precede a spiritual session when
people begin to be "slain in the spirit," falling back
into the arms of others.
Women come up to the stage and Gina cries, "Fill her,
Lord Jesus, fill her!" And a minister named Grace begins
singing loudly, "Ain't nobody do me like Jesus!' She gets
the audience to respond, "No, ain't nobody do me like Jesus!"
Everyone being so oblivious to the service's sexual nature
disturbed Minkowitz, who says, "They weren't distinguishing
between 'them' and 'you.' That erodes the sense of the other person
as an individual."
In the end, the book is about her relationship with the religious
right, a quasi-romance filled with sex, paradox and fear, a metaphor
for relationships, hers, ours, yours.
She is no longer a strident believer in the rightness or victim
status of gay men and lesbians. Nor has she become a true believer
in "The 700 Club." She passionately disagrees with much
of the message of the religious right, but better understands
its appeal. And she liked many of its believers. She writes:
"I had to disarm myself to get inside this land. I took
off my weapons, and my incense too. And as my feet dipped in the
velvety grass, I could see there was no redeemer. No enslaver.
Only other people."
X X X
(c) 1998, The Philadelphia Inquirer.
Visit Philadelphia Online, the Inquirer's World Wide Web site,
at http://www.phillynews.com/
Distributed by Knight-Ridder/Tribune Information Services.
Send a Letter to the Editor about This
Story | Start or Join A Discussion about This Story
Send the URL (Address)
of This Story to A Friend:
Copyright ©1998,
Abilene Reporter-News / Texnews / E.W. Scripps Publications
|