Wednesday, October 29, 1997
Both Farm Bureau and Farmers Union oppose home
equity lending
By J.T. Smith / Abilene Reporter-News
Those in agriculture are well aware that Texas Farm Bureau
and Texas Farmers Union often have taken opposing views on matters.
But on the issue of home equity lending, they are both strongly
opposed.
"In Texas, bankers have successfully pressured the legislature
into offering a proposed constitutional amendment for voters to
decide on November fourth," said Wes Sims, a Sweetwater dairy
producer and Texas Farmers Union president.
Sims said the ballot language of Proposition 8 is deceptively
pleasant: "The amendement to the Texas Constitution expanding
the types of liens for home equity loans that a lender, with the
homeowner's consent, may place against a homestead."
The TFU leader said that as early as 1837, prior to statehood,
Texas protected its people against forced sale of their homes
to pay debts.
Foreclosure on homesteads is currently allowed only for money
owed for the original purchase, home improvements, taxes -- and
more recently -- for debts resulting from partition agreements
generally arising in a case of divorce.
But this proposed constitutional amendment would allow Texans
to pledge their homes as collateral for loans.
Sims said the amendment is strongly backed by big banks who
want to make more loans and thereby, earn more profit from interest
paid on loans.
"Those favoring the amendment say that sufficient consumer
protection has been written into the enabling legislation which
will take effect if the amendment passes," Sims noted. "The
Texas Farmers Union is urging Texans to vote against Proposition
8 becasue even though safeguards are included -- we believe this
is only a first step by bankers and that they will come back during
future legislative sessions to chip away at the safeguards."
Sims said it comes down to a matter of homesteads.
Farm Bureau cites home equity dark side
Meanwhile, the Texas Farm Bureau also is attempting to present
the other side of home equity loans.
"Throw enough money at an issue, and you can make even
the worst idea sound as American as 'mom and apple pie,' "
said Bob Stallman, TFB president, Waco. "In the case of home
equity lending, it's disturbing to think that mom might end up
losing her house and kitchen because of an idea that lenders say
is in the best interest of Texans. The only thing being cooked
up here is a recipe for disaster."
Millions of dollars of advertising and message control have
tried to paint this as a "property rights issue" for
Texans, Stallman laments. These ads point out that Texas is the
only state in the nation that does not allow this type of borrowing.
But Stallman said the real issue is this: Texas voters on Nov.
4 will decide whether to turn their back on more than 150 years
of Texas heritage and allow expanded home-equity lending in their
state.
"Look at the 'bottom line' -- as all lenders do -- and
you'll see who's making the push and why," Stallman noted.
"A survey by a Houston financial company estimates that if
the proposition passes, the home equity loan volume in Texas for
the first two years will be $17.9 billion. That's a staggering
amount of money and new business for lenders."
Stallman noted that the Wall Street Journal -- in an article
in the Aug. 20 issue -- said: "The prospect of homeowners
rushing to apply for loans has more lenders licking their chops
than running for cover."
The idea that signing such a loan will be strictly voluntary
simply isn't true.
"I contend there will be instances when pressure from
outside influences will force a person to sign the dotted line
and put their home in jeopardy," Stallman said.
When a farmer seeks an operating loan, personal assets like
equipment, land and livestock are typically used as collateral.
But if a lender says that's not enough, other sources must be
found. Perhaps the lender suggests a Certificate of Deposit would
qualify the farmer.
If that farmer/rancher happens to live in town and there is
more than 20 percent equity available in his home, then there's
the solution. Equity in the home could purchase the CD.
The are no stipulations as to how proceeds from a home equity
loan can be applied.
Such a scenario does not violate the proposal's prohibition
against cross-collaterlization or its exemption prohibiting ag
homesteads from being eligible.
"Think about all of the homes that would have been subject
to foreclosure in the mid-80s during the oil and real estate crisis
if this type of lending had been allowed," Stallman said.
"For more than 150 years, the homestead protections built
into the Texas Constitution has served the state and its people
well. Now is not the time to rewrite Texas tradition and common
sense."
Send a Letter to the Editor about This
Story | Start or Join A Discussion about This Story
Send the URL (Address) of This Story to A Friend:
Copyright ©1997,
Abilene Reporter-News / Texnews / E.W. Scripps. Publications
|