Sunday, May 18, 1997
Weevils will be zapped one way or another at
some cost
By J.T. SMITH / Abilene Reporter-News
Since the Texas Supreme Court declared the Boll Weevil Eradication
Program unconstitutional in Texas on April 30, there's been enough
rhetoric to suffocate all the weevils in Texas.
So let's cut through it and look at some realities.
The issue is not - and has never been - whether Texas will
grow cotton or not. Texas is the No. 1 producer of cotton in the
United States. The gins, compresses, warehouses, and even some
top-notch textile facilities operate in Texas. The city of Lubbock
itself - and surrounding High Plains counties - are dependent
upon cotton.
A study by Texas A&M and Texas Tech University showed that
High Plains regional business sales could drop by $500 million
a year if the boll weevil populations are allowed to go unchecked.
As the leading cash crop in Texas, cotton generates $1.6 billion
for Texas farmers alone. It is worth billions more to the Texas
economy and employs many thousands of people in the state.
Cotton is not going to vanish because of the boll weevil, cotton
bollworm, aphids, and assorted other pests. Farmers will control
the weevil and other pesky critters.
So the real issues are simply two:
-- At what cost will the cotton grower control the boll weevil?
-- Will farmers work together as a team in fighting the weevil,
or is it back to the old days of "every man for himself?"
That's it, folks.
Don't think farmers will quit spraying because five out of
nine Texas Supreme Court justices acknowledged that the weevil
program was good yet still ruled that the Texas Legislature couldn't
give the broad power to administer it to essentially a private
foundation.
It's just the opposite. Without eradication, more pesticide
than ever will be used. It will be back to the ol' days.
The Boll Weevil Eradication Program began in Virginia with
the pilot program in 1978. Next came North Carolina. Then South
Carolina. Florida, Georgia, and Alabama soon joined the effort.
North Carolina was down to a mere 20,000 or so acres of cotton
for the entire state before weevil eradication. After eradication,
land devoted to cotton production soon swelled to more than 600,000
acres. New cotton gins were rising up as fast they could be constructed.
King Cotton had returned to the South.
Many farmers went from spraying 16 to 20 times per season for
weevils to just one containment spray - and only that if needed
along a buffer zone.
Before eradication, Georgia - once a proud cotton state - had
fallen to 300,000 acres of cotton. Since weevil eradication, Georgia
has increased its cotton to 1.5 million acres.
Throughout the South as a whole, insecticide use has been reduced
40 to 85 percent.
Obviously, this is a tremendous savings in production costs
to the Southern grower.
At the same time, such decreased use of pesticide is also a
positive step for the environment.
Arizona was declared weevil-free in 1991, and farmers have
not sprayed for boll weevils since.
But Texas is a big, BIG state.
The original plan (for many years) had been to let the eradication
work progress meticulously from North Texas to deep South Texas
in the Rio Grande Valley, then push the weevil on back into Mexico
from which it came to the United States in 1892.
But somewhere along the way, that got changed. The Valley got
in early.
The Valley is a different world - one where growers began planting
cotton in February. (Some years, we still may be trying to gin
the last of the previous year's crop in February).
Valley farmers have a contest to gin the first bale in the
United States that usually comes about June 20 or 21st. The nation's
first bale always comes from the Valley. It's just a matter of
which farmer wins the contest (which is witnessed and verified
by the local police department).
It's not uncommon for a farmer in our area at Rule or Anson
or Roby, for example, to still be attempting to plant cotton the
third week of June if a stormy May delayed cotton planting.
Hence, our part of Texas - because of the latitude - is much
more like Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, or Georgia in its cultural
practices than the Rio Grande Valley.
Some powerful growers in the Valley have decided they would
rather tackle weevils on their own. That's their right.
If, before June 2, the Texas Legislature can come up with a
better mousetrap - perhaps under the leadership of the Texas Department
of Agriculture - the weevil effort can be saved.
Although it's often said "you can't please everyone"
- hopefully, a new team effort would please the different regions
of Texas.
There's just too much at stake and too much already invested.
In just the past three years, the farmer-owned Farm Credit
Bank of Texas and seven Production Credit Associations have provided
financing - in good faith - for the Texas Boll Weevil Eradication
Program to the tune of $37 million.
The Rolling Plains PCA alone is owed $3,123,462 by the eradication
program.
No matter what the Texas Legislature does now, unless there
is some assurance in the law that this existing debt can be collected,
it's doubtful any financial institution would provide funding
for the weevil program - or any similar program in the future.
As soon as the next morning after the long-awaited Supreme
Court decision, some cotton industry folks in a southern state
were calling some Texas cotton leaders here on the Rolling Plains
and "inquiring" as to what would be done with all the
massive amount of equipment that had been immediately idled with
the high court's ruling.
Meanwhile, USDA appropriations for fiscal year 1997 allow for
$34 million in loan authority across the entire Cotton Belt for
boll weevil eradication. Texas had been due to get about $18.5
million of that, starting in mid-June. But USDA officials had
made it clear Texas could not be eligible for the money until
a favorable Supreme Court decision.
But the ruling went the other way. Obviously, the Southern
states with ongoing weevil eradication programs will be after
this money like a dog on a bone.
The message is clear: the South is ready to battle the weevil.
Texas will battle the weevil, too. The question is whether
that will be together - or individually. And, at what cost?
Send a Letter to the Editor about This
Story | Start or Join A Discussion about This Story
Send the URL (Address) of This Story to A Friend:
Copyright ©1997,
Abilene Reporter-News / Texnews / E.W. Scripps. Publications
|