Saturday, March 22, 1997
Saying is not necessarily believing
We're not going to church the way we used to. At least the
Texas Poll says we're not.
I don't doubt the poll results. I know I don't go to church
as much as I used to - mostly because I don't have to. Since I
quit preaching, I have worked most Saturdays at the newspaper
and often find that I'm prone to sleeping late on Sunday morning.
My family does its best to get me going, but I use the tiredness
excuse anyway.
What surprised me about the poll results was that while we're
not going to church as much as we used to, we insist that we believe
the Bible is God's word and that what it says is true. We have
a dichotomy here, or a paradox, or whatever it's called.
You see, in the New Testament at least, religion and worship
take place in community. Paul wrote mostly to churches, and when
he writes to individuals, the church is a central theme in the
letters. Everywhere he goes, Paul either encounters a church or
establishes one. Christians are admonished to be careful not to
neglect assembling themselves together. Even the last book deals
with the church and churches.
So if we believe the Bible so much, how come we don't go to
church?
Well, according to the analysts the poll takers talked to,
we lack religious commitment. Huh? We have another paradox, or
maybe it's a conundrum. We believe the Bible is God's word and
yet we're not committed. In fact one analyst said church is more
about social connections nowadays than it is about faith.
And that, gentle readers, is completely out of whack.
The simple fact is, if we say we believe something but are
unwilling to act on that belief, we don't really believe it. James
tried to make that point to Christians who claimed that because
they lived under grace, they could act anyway they wanted.
"I'll show you my faith by my works," he said. Martin
Luther had problems with James, but he missed the point. If we
say we believe the Bible, then we'd best be committed because
the book says we have to be committed. We'd best attend a gathering
of believers somewhere because the book says it's vitally important
we do so.
We'd like a nice, comfortable religion that lets us embrace
beliefs we don't have to act on. Then we can sound sincere and
religious without actually having to be sincere and religious.
"Oh, yes, I believe in forgiveness," we'd be able
to say, all the while holding grudges against everyone who ever
wronged us.
Or, we could say that we'd follow Jesus anywhere, as long as
he didn't try to lead us into loving the unlovable or into feeding
the poor, or visiting the sick and imprisoned, or giving drink
to the thirsty or nourishment to the hungry or clothing to the
naked.
If he did, we might have to admit that maybe we don't believe
the Bible as much as we say we do. And then we'd know why we really
don't attend church.
Michael O'Connor is Online Editor for the Abilene Reporter-News
and is and ordained United Methodist minister. He can be reached
by e-mail at religion(at)abinews.com.
Send a Letter to the Editor about This
Story | Start or Join A Discussion about This Story
Send the URL (Address)
of This Story to A Friend:
Copyright ©1997,
Abilene Reporter-News / Texnews / E.W. Scripps. Publications
|