|
PRINT
THIS PAGE | E-MAIL THIS PAGE
Friday, August 29, 1997
Garza says 'time has come' to end some federal
supervision
By MICHAEL HOLMES / Associated Press Writer
AUSTIN (AP) -- Secretary of State Tony Garza, arguing that
Texas is a leader in making it easy for people to vote, Thursday
said the time has come for the state to be freed from some provisions
of the federal Voting Rights Act.
Garza said Texas should be exempt from requirements that it
first obtain U.S. Justice Department approval of every election
law change.
"If Washington thinks we should keep putting up with such
bureaucratic micromanagement like we have for the past 20 years,
it can guess again. They're wrong. We don't need it," Garza
said.
Opposition to the idea was voiced by groups representing minorities.
"The Voting Rights Act is an essential ingredient if we
are ever to obtain true justice and democracy," said Gary
Bledsoe, Texas president of the National Association for the Advancement
of Colored People.
Congress passed the act in 1965 to, in the words of a federal
court ruling, "banish the blight of racial discrimination
in voting."
And Garza said he isn't talking about the part of the law guaranteeing
citizens -- regardless of race -- the right to vote. That section
applies in all 50 states.
Rather, Garza said, he wants relief from the part of the law
called Section 5. It requires prior Justice Department approval
of election law changes made in eight Southern states and Alaska,
plus some counties and townships in seven more states.
"Today, Texas is one of the most progressive states in
terms of making it easy for all citizens to register and vote
-- heck, astronauts can now vote from space -- and yet the federal
government continues to operate in a time-warp, subjecting Texas
to burdensome supervision that's based on an outdated presumption
of discrimination," Garza said.
"It's time to take Texas out from this specific provision,"
he said.
Both the NAACP and the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational
Fund said the Voting Rights Act should remain in force.
The law "is basically a way of monitoring states to ensure
they do not violate the voting rights of minorities," said
MALDEF's Al Kauffman. "As long as Texas proposes fair changes
in voting, the Justice Department will not object."
NAACP president Bledsoe said intimidation of black and Hispanic
voters still occurs across the state, and racial gerrymandering
"continues at all levels" of electoral politics.
"The Voting Rights Act is needed to at least provide an
avenue for minorities to challenge these actions in effective
and efficient ways," Bledsoe said. "If there are problems
with the law, the answer is not to throw the baby out with the
bath water."
The "preclearance" requirement has delayed numerous
actions approved by the Texas Legislature, Garza said. That included
state takeover of a financially troubled school district, creation
of new county courts and management of scarce water resources,
he said.
Garza, a Republican appointed by Gov. George W. Bush to be
the state's chief elections officer, emphasized his commitment
to the voting law's main purpose -- making certain every citizen
has a vote.
"The act ... had a profound impact on the political landscape
of America, serving to markedly increase the voice of minorities
in the political process," he said in a letter to Texas congressmen.
He noted that Texas makes it easy to register to vote; has
a lengthy early voting period for casting "no excuses"
absentee ballots; and even conducts early voting in places such
as shopping malls.
However, Garza said, requiring prior federal approval of Texas
election laws has outlived its purpose and is an insult to the
Texas Legislature.
"It really is an affront to the integrity of the legislative
process in Texas," he said.
Send a Letter to the Editor about This
Story | Start or Join A Discussion about This Story
Send the URL (Address) of This Story
to A Friend:
Copyright ©1997,
Abilene Reporter-News / Texnews / E.W. Scripps Publications
Send
the URL (Address) of This Story to A Friend:
|